Peace
Studies
A short history of Friends
in America
Friends
have been in the Americas
for three centuries, and
from time to time their
Religious Society has
been split. Some splits
still affect the Society,
although in the last hundred
years or so there have
been attempts at reconciliation,
partially successful.
This document gives a
brief overview.
One reference for the
following paragraphs has
been Margaret Bacon's
_The Quiet Rebels: The
Story of the Quakers in
America_. For another
account of the same history,
see Mike Hopkin's Quaker
Alphabet Soup. The first
significant split among
Friends in the American
colonies occurred in the
Philadelphia area in 1692-93,
little more than a decade
after Penn's "Holy Experiment"
had started (and just
1-2 years after George
Fox died). This schism
is generally overlooked
among Friends, perhaps
because the "Keithians,"
calling themselves "Christian
Quakers," were successfully
suppressed by Friends
holding the reins of power
in Penn's colony. At a
key juncture, they had
George Keith and several
supporters arrested and
prosecuted for sedition.
Although the jury failed
to convict on the most
serious charges, the Keithians
were never able to build
up their momentum again.
Not
much later, Keith went
to London Yearly Meeting
and asked them to endorse
his position, but the
Friends in London disowned
him, and a few years later
Keith joined the Episcopal
Church. During this period,
the established group
was known as "Lloydians,"
after Lieutenant-Governor
Thomas Lloyd. (William
Penn was Governor, but
was in England throughout
this time of conflict.)
For one account, written
by a non-Friend, see the
pages here on the Keithian
schism. Several elements
of this account seem particularly
striking in light of the
dynamics of later splits.
The initial conflict centered
on "the sufficiency of
the inward Christ," as
distinct from the "historical
Christ" given in Scriptures.
This question still resonates
in Friends' religious
thinking. Also, it's interesting
how Friends tried to handle
the growing conflict using
their standard devices;
in the end the differences
proved irreconcilable.
Then, once the Keithians
established themselves
as a separate group, with
stronger emphasis on specific
doctrines and practices
such as baptism and communion,
they faced further division
over such matters, and
within a decade or so
most if not all of the
"Christian Quakers" joined
other denominations such
as Seventh Day Baptists,
Presbyterians and Episcopalians.
Quakers
in other parts of the
American colonies -- particularly
in Rhode Island, Maine,
on Long Island, New York,
and in smaller numbers
in Maryland and south
-- apparently were not
much affected by these
goings-on in the Philadelphia
area, and the Lloydian/Keithian
schism might be called
a local affair. In the
early 1700s it may have
appeared that Friends
would be one of the major
denominations in the American
colonies. By the end of
the 18th century, however,
they were only a small
minority in the United
States. This slow fade
can be attributed, at
least partly, to what
is called "Quietism,"
that is, a tendency to
stand on tradition in
the absence of strong
leading from the Spirit.
This tendency affected
Friends on both sides
of the Atlantic. During
this period, many members
of the Society were disowned
from, or "read out of,"
the Meetings they were
born into -- for instance
when they married "out
of meeting" or violated
Quaker testimonies pertaining
to fancy clothing, music,
gambling, etc.
Meanwhile,
the Society of Friends
attracted few new members,
appearing austere and
old-fashioned, though
perhaps honest and well-meaning.
During the same period,
interestingly, Quakers
struggled toward and finally
arrived at testimonies
against slavery, and against
direct involvement in
the affairs of state,
especially when these
involved military preparations
and campaigning. These
struggles and the resolutions
which developed can be
seen as another aspect
of the Quietist tendency.
During the American Revolution,
some Friends (including
Betsy Ross and General
Nathanael Greene) actively
sided with the pro-Independence
side and were read out
of their meetings. In
Philadelphia, they formed
the Free Quakers, a group
that maintained a Friends
Meeting from 1781 to 1834.
When the war was over,
many others left the Society
of Friends, according
to Kevin Phillips in his
new book, The Cousins'
Wars, largely because
of the feeling that Quakers
had favored the British
side (1999, pp. 211-17
and 643-44 fn. 68). Daniel
Boone is one of the more
famous individuals in
American history whose
family left Friends at
this juncture.
Perhaps
a number of factors --
Quietism, waves of disownment,
neutrality during the
Revolutionary War, and
anti-Quaker sentiment
after the war -- combined
to reduce the relative
size and influence of
the Society of Friends
in America during the
1700s. Meanwhile, as the
frontier opened up beyond
the thirteen colonies,
Friends began to move
in large numbers into
the interior of the continent.
Many settled in Ohio and
Indiana, and later in
Iowa, and in these areas
the heartland of American
Quakerism developed. The
most serious splits in
the Society of Friends
in North America occurred
in the early and mid-1800s,
when Friends came under
the growing influence
of the Methodists and
other evangelical groups
first active in Britain.
Changes
seem to have started with
younger and more progressive
Friends, often living
in the larger cities,
who were most affected
by the new and vibrant
evangelical movement.
As these Friends gained
influence, they pressed
for changes in their meetings.
Thus, for instance, "in
1806 Philadelphia Yearly
Meeting revised its discipline
and introduced for the
first time an article
making it a cause for
disownment to 'deny the
divinity of our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ, the
immediate revelation of
the Holy Spirit, or the
authenticity of the Scriptures'"
(Bacon, p. 86). This shift
led to a fresh exodus
from the Society, but
many Friends resisted
and over the next two
decades their frustrations
became centered with the
ministry of Elias Hicks,
a Friend and travelling
minister from Long Island,
New York, who championed
a more spiritualistic
and less dogmatic approach.
Tensions between urban
and rural Friends, issues
of control, and personality
conflicts compounded the
difficulties. Matters
came to a head in 1827
-- "the Great Separation"
-- when Philadelphia Yearly
Meeting split into two
yearly meetings, colloquially
called Hicksite and Orthodox.
Each faction consolidated
their control of meeting
houses, schools, graveyards,
trustfunds, etc.
The
following year, New York
and Baltimore Yearly Meetings
split. In these three
places, Hicksites had
the numerical majority.
Subsequently, Ohio Yearly
Meeting split roughly
in half (and "roughly"
is the word for it), and
Indiana Yearly Meeting,
newly created, became
Orthodox after a small
number of Hicksites split
away. In the following
decades, the evangelical
movement in the United
States and Britain strengthened,
and Orthodox Friends felt
more pressure to conform
to its principles. Joseph
John Gurney, an evangelist
from a prominent family
of British Quakers, came
to the American states
and, in the course of
events during the 1840s-50s,
several Orthodox Yearly
Meetings split into Gurneyite
and Wilburite factions,
the latter named after
John Wilbur, of Rhode
Island, who travelled
from meeting to meeting
to oppose Gurney and the
changes that Gurney was
urging upon Orthodox Friends.
In Philadelphia, Friends
remained divided between
Orthodox and Hicksite
Yearly Meetings.
The
Orthodox Yearly Meeting,
however, refused to be
drawn into any further
splits, succeeding by
the simple expedient of
not formally recognizing
any other Orthodox Yearly
Meeting, whether Gurneyite
or Wilburite. (It is said,
however, that they leaned
heavily toward the Wilburites.)
The Philadelphia Yearly
Meeting was finally reunited
in 1955. In the years
after the Civil War, many
Gurneyite meetings turned
to what was called a "pastoral"
system of worship, perhaps
trying to keep up the
evangelical enthusiasm
with the help of paid
pastors. In reaction to
this turn, however, some
Friends broke away to
establish Conservative
Yearly Meetings in North
Carolina, Indiana, Iowa,
Kansas, and Canada, retaining
the historical mode of
silent "unprogrammed"
worship.
Conservative
Friends also kept the
plain dress and plain
speech (thee and thy)
of the early generations
of Friends, maintaining
these traditions well
into the 20th century,
although they were dropped
as matters of discipline.
In the first decade of
the 20th century, Gurneyite
Friends consolidated into
what was called the Five
Years Meeting, a grouping
of Yearly Meetings, hoping
to include a range of
beliefs and practices
including both "pastoral"
and "unprogrammed" worship.
The most fundamentalist
and anti-modernist of
these Friends broke off,
however, and eventually
formed the Evangelical
Friends Alliance, now
Evangelical Friends International
(EFI).
Five Years Meeting has
become the Friends United
Meeting (FUM), the single
largest body of Friends
in North America. Meanwhile,
in some places Evangelical
Friends have been experimenting
with baptism and communion,
putting themselves (unknowingly?)
on the theological ground
staked out by Keithians
three centuries earlier.
In the same period that
the Five Years Meeting
started also came the
formation of the Friends
General Conference (FGC),
and eventually the reconciliation
of Orthodox, Hicksite,
and Wilburite Yearly Meetings
in the eastern U.S. Some
of these Yearly Meetings
are associated with both
FUM and FGC. In other
areas, particularly in
the Midwest, FUM-affiliated
meetings (and "churches")
predominate, with FGC
and Conservative meetings
scattered more thinly
about. Evangelical Yearly
Meetings in the U.S. are
based in Ohio, Kansas,
the Rocky Mountain States,
and along the Pacific
coast, although there
are also a few Evangelical
Friends' churches scattered
elsewhere in the country.